STUDIES

Histologic Evaluation of Wound-Bed Preparedness Following Microsurfaced Skin Grafts for the Treatment of Deep Burn Wounds: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Lisa M. Marinelli MD; Kevin Krauland MD   Department of Pathology and Area Laboratory Services, Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, TX

Conclusion: Microsurfaced skin grafts resulted in consistent incorporation and greater cellular infiltration and graft thickness than their control graft counterparts, a finding we attribute to increased surface area at the graft-to-host interface.

Table 1. Histologic comparison of features of wound bed preparedness following microsurfaced and control split thickness skin grafts.

Microsurfaced Split Thickness Skin Grafts Control Split Thickness Skin Grafts p-value
Incorporation (Scale 1-5; median [IQR])
4 (4-5)
2 (1-5)
0.4
Maximum (cell/mm2; median [IQR])
3,661 (1,966-6,403)
1,511 (871-2258)
0.004
Predominant cell type of neutrophils (# [%])
9 (90)
1 (10)
0.001
Total graft thickness (mm; mean [SD])
1.5 (0.82)
0.92 (0.47)
0.02

Porcine Study: David Stevens, DVM, PhD a

Premier Laboratory  LLC, Longmont, CO

 Clinical Hypothesis By resurfacing dermal grafts for internal reconstruction and external wounds you:

  • Increase the surface area and absorption of medications

  • Increased adhesion/seal between host - graft

  • Increase the cellular interaction between the graft and the human tissue

  • Faster incorporation of the resurfaced graft

  • Better fibrous foundation for healing

Histopathology Report Conclusions:

  1. With respect to the dermal construct implants, the texturized samples elicited an enhanced inflammatory/cellular response compared to the controls, especially at day 7 and 14.

  2. Texturizing amniotic membranes also enhanced the cellular response, especially in the day 7 samples.